.jpg&w=244&h=193&zc=1 "Mike Trout and the sophomore slump that wasn't")
.jpg&w=244&h=193&zc=1 "Why the Pujols contract isn't as bad as you think")
Peter Bourjos: Play him or trade him
The die has been cast. Jerry Dipoto made his decision and ushered fan-favorite Torii Hunter out the door and into the wilderness of free agency, In so doing he has also ushered in the Peter Bourjos era... again.
A fan-favorite to a much lesser degree, Bourjos appears to have been given back his starting outfield job. He didn't earn it back, mind you, he was simply gifted it. As you surely know, Bourjos followed up on his breakout 2011 campaign that endeared him to the fanbase by devolving into the sort of bust that some worried he'd be before 2011. Confusing enough, right?
He breaks out when he is supposed to fall on his face and then falls on his face when he is supposed cement his status as a top-tier center fielder. So, sure, go ahead and give him the starting gig since nobody really know what to expect anyway, right?
Essentially, Jerry Dipoto is gambling that Peter, who should finally be healthy in 2013 after being plagued by hip and wrist injuries in 2012, will more closely resemble his 2011 self. It also doesn't hurt that he costs peanuts. $150 million payroll or no, the Halos need to mix in some cheap labor to keep their costs under control. There is also little doubt that no matter what he does with his bat, his glove will always be there to provide a ton of value. After all, we are talking about maybe the one guy in baseball who is a clear defensive upgrade over Mike Trout.
This is a strategy I really shouldn't complain about. After all, I think I threatened to burn down various structures in the greater Anaheim area if the Halos traded Bourjos in any of the various rumors he was involved in the off-season prior to the 2012 season. That's what makes this next part so awkward, because now, I kind of think that maybe forcing Bourjos back in center isn't such a great idea.
Look, I get the reasons to like the move. He and Trout would be such a great defensive pairing that the Angels could install a fire hydrant in the other corner outfield spot and it wouldn't really matter. An added bonus would be that while Trout's defensive skills would not be maximized in left, his long-term health would be better served in left field where he would be recklessly hurtling his body into the outfield wall at a far less frequent rate. As for Speedy Petey's bat, it could be rejuvenated now that he is healthy and his athleticism would be a welcome addition to a team that has become less reliant on small ball and aggressive baserunning, you know, if you are the sort that thinks that is a bad trend. And finally, with Bourjos making near the league minimum, it frees up cash for the Angels to use on rebuilding the pitching staff.
I want to believe in everything in that last paragraph, I really do, but I can't. Three things keep nagging at me when I consider a starting outfield of Trout-Bourjos-Trumbo. First and foremost, with Trout in left field he will never ever provide the Angels with his full possible value. Trout's bat might receive a slight boost from the reduced mileage on his legs, but being the best defensive left fielder in baseball just isn't nearly as valuable as being the best defensive center fielder. Call me crazy, but intentionally assuring that you will only get 90% of the full value from one of the greatest talents of a generation just rubs me the wrong way.
There is also the small matter of Bourjos' ability itself. Given how the Angel roster is currently constructed, do you realize what happens if Bourjos tanks at the plate again? Yes, that's right, suddenly Vernon Wells becomes a big part of our everyday life again. Mike Scioscia had no qualms about burying Bourjos on the bench when he struggled last season, I'm sure he won't hesitate to do so once again if he comes out of the gates slow in 2013. Perhaps Dipoto will anticipate this and dump Wells before the season, but that just means Kole Calhoun would be next in line. He's far less loathsome than Wells but there is no guarantee whatsoever that he'd be more productive.
Finally, by committing to Bourjos, the Angels are passing on using one of the best trade assets. Considering that the Angels have two rotation spots and multiple bullpen jobs to fill, the trade market will almost certainly be something they explore in this wafer-thin free agent market. But how will they acquire any kind of impact player without Bourjos? Their farm system is woefully shallow right now. Their two best prospects are Kaleb Cowart, who they likely won't want to trade since they need a third baseman of the future, and C.J. Cron, who might be strictly a DH and thus not attractive to half the teams in baseball. No, any major deal is almost certainly going to require Bourjos as the centerpiece.
What I would propose is that instead of going with Bourjos as the third starting outfielder, the Angels trade him for good, young starting pitching since there is so few quality free agent options. They could then use the money they would still be saving by signing more proven overall commodities like B.J. Upton, Nick Swisher, Michael Bourn, Cody Ross or, well, Torii Hunter. There is a chance that the player they sign is not appreciably better or possibly even worse, but, for the most part, there is more certainty in their expected performance than there is from Bourjos. Plus, in most scenarios, it leaves Trout in center where his full utility can be maximized.
I'm not entirely sold that this is a superior option to Dipoto's current plan, but it certainly seems to be similarly viable. In fact, when I started writing this, I was in favor of trading Bourjos, but having laid it all out now, I think I am leaning towards riding it out with him now. But I'm sure if you give me five minutes I'll change my mind again. I guess it ultimately has less to do with Bourjos himself and more to do with how confident Jerry is in being able to manage all the moving parts involved in the trade scenario. I mean, if he was sure he could swap Bourjos for Hellickson and sign Swisher, then I think that is an easy move to make. However, if he isn't sure about Swisher and winds up with Cody Ross instead then maybe not so much with this idea.
Ugh, I just don't know now. I am a house divided against myself, but I think it is in a good way because this does seem like kind of a win-win scenario in that the Angels either make us happy by keeping Bourjos or make us happy by trading him for young pitching and signing a big(ger) bat.
 |
Like MWAH on Facebook |  |
Follow MWAH on Twitter |
1 Like
Peter Bourjos is a necessary part of the Angels lineup in 2013. It isn't because Torii Hunter left and it isn't because we need to save money. Peter Bourjos is needed because Dan Haren, Ervin Santana and Zack Greinke left. There's a really good chance the Angels will have Garrett Richards, and a not-so-great #4 SP as the back end of the rotation in 2013. There's no better solution to shoring up a shallow and possibly inconsistent starting rotation than providing them with an impenetrable OF.
Plus, there may be no better negotiating tool in the Greinke talks than Peter Bourjos and Mike Trout in the OF. Why would Greinke want to go to Texas where even the most routine pop flies leave the yard? Why go to the Dodgers when Matt Kemp looks destined for a corner OF spot soon and they have no suitable replacements? Angels stadium may grade out as a relatively nuetral park, but with Trout and Bourjos sharing the same OF, it becoems an extreme pitchers park whenever an Angel is on the mound.
Yeah, I'll take that advantage. On top of which, this is just me, but I think in a full season Bourjos delivers .280/.320 30 DB 10 triples, 15-20 HR and 30+ SB. Hunter in 2013, given the predictable drop in BABIP, I'd give him .280/.340 25 DB 15 HR and 5 SB. I'm in the minority, but I believe that Hunter's 2012 BA is an outlier and that in 2013, Bourjos will not only be more valuable defensively than Hunter, he'll out produce him offensively too.
1 Like
I like the idea of him out there. If we trade for a real upgrade some place then fine, but I don't see much a big trade going down for the same reasons you offer for him staying. There are serviceable options out there in free agency so why would anyone need to trade with us? Especially for pitching that is so hard to find. We can't even use him as a throw-in on a bigger deal cuz we really have no other pieces. So I look forward to Speedy Petey being out there and circling the bases with his high socks. I know .240 will be a satisfying year but hope that Scioscia gets back to his small ball and this team starts stealing bases again.
BTW, when will the Monkey throw some fantastic sabermetric at us explaing why, in a league full of crappy catchers, the Angels don't steal or pinch run like they should? I know we have power bats now, but gotta be able to distract pitchers a little more.
1 Like
You made great points for both arguments. My question remains the same before I read this. What grade SP is pbj worth a 2 or 3. You mentioned helickson, where do you grade him?
